Tracy v. Boar's Head Provisions Co Inc
James Tracy |
Boar's Head Provisions Co Inc |
2:2020cv00205 |
October 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Lee P Rudofsky |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #11 Response to Motion filed by All Defendants. (Duke, Melissa) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion re #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by All Defendants. (Duke, Melissa) |
Filing 10 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #9 Remand to State Court filed by James Tracy. (Sutter, Luther) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Remand to State Court by James Tracy (Sutter, Luther) |
Filing 8 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Report due by 1/12/2021 and Jury Trial set for 2/22/2022 at 9:30 AM in Helena, Arkansas Courtroom # 314 before Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 10/23/2020. (hml) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate and/or Set Aside the Court's 05/30/2020 Order; granting Defendants' Motions to Dismiss with respect to Plaintiff's civil conspiracy claim; dismissing without prejudice the civil conspiracy claims against Boar's Head and Drone; granting Defendants' Motions to Dismiss with respect to the defamation claim against Boar's Head and Drone; dismissing with prejudice the defamation claim; and dismissing Defendant Drone from this litigation. Signed by Circuit Judge Christopher W. Morledge on 10/14/2020. (ajt) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #5 Amended Complaint with Jury Demand by Boar's Head Provisions Co Inc.(ajt) |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by James Tracy.(ajt) |
Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS granting motion to dismiss without prejudice and dismissing Defendant Gillette Drone from this action. Signed by Circuit Judge Christopher W. Morledge on 05/30/2020. (ajt) (Docket text modified on 10/22/2020 to correct signature date.)(cmn) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Boar's Head Provisions Co Inc.(ajt) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by James Tracy.(ajt) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Boar's Head Provisions Co Inc from St. Franics County Circuit Court, case number 62-CV-20-35-3. Fee $400 paid, receipt number LIT079431. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ajt) |
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #4 Order. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to correct the signature date as 05/30/2020 as marked on the document. (cmn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tracy v. Boar's Head Provisions Co Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Boar's Head Provisions Co Inc | |
Represented By: | Mary Elizabeth Buckley |
Represented By: | Melissa McJunkins Duke |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: James Tracy | |
Represented By: | Luther Oneal Sutter |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.