Whiteaker v. Brandon et al
| Marcus Whiteaker |
| Rex G Lay, April L Brandon, Anthony Jackson and Janice Blake |
| 2:2020cv00224 |
| November 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Brian S Miller |
| J Thomas Ray |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; plaintiff's custodian is directed to collect an initial partial filing fee of $13.00 from his institutional account and to send it to the Clerk; Thereafter, your custodian must collect monthly payments equal to 20% of the preceding months income credited to plaintiff's institutional account; provided that, at the time those payments are collected, the account has a balance that exceeds $10.00; The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to the Warden of the East Arkansas Regional Unit, the ADC Trust Fund Centralization Bank Office, and the ADC Compliance Office. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 11/10/20. (tjb)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Marcus Whiteaker. (ljb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marcus Whiteaker. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
