Akkub v. Knott et al
| Anthony Nelson Akkub |
| C Bell, Granville, Bardon, Tina Dean, Banks, Kelly, Lane, Field, Knott, Norment, Greg Rechciql, Dean and Wendy Kelley |
| 2:2021cv00006 |
| January 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| James M Moody |
| Joe J Volpe |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending #2 Complaint be dismissed without prejudice; and recommending the Court certify that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting this recommendation and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of this recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 2/23/2021. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER denying Plaintiff's IFP Application pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) #1 . Plaintiff must submit to the Clerk of this Court the statutory filing fee of $402, in full, within 21 days of the date of this order. Failure to do so will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 1/20/2021. (lej)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Anthony Nelson Akkub. (llg) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Anthony Nelson Akkub. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
