Harris v. Wehco Video Inc et al
Johnny Harris |
Paul Morbeck, Don Deem, Charlotte Dial, Lori Haight and Wehco Video Inc |
2:2021cv00040 |
April 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Kristine G Baker |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 motion to extend time to respond to defendants WEHCO Video, Inc., Lori Haight, Don Deem, Charlotte Dial, and Paul Morbeck's #2 motion to dismiss Mr. Harris's complaint. The time for Mr. Harris to respond to the motion to dismiss is extended to, and including, 6/30/2021. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 6/9/2021. (jbh) |
Filing 5 REQUEST for Extension of Time to File Response as to #2 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss by Johnny Harris. (jap) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Wehco Video Inc (Gaines, Robert) |
Filing 3 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #2 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by All Defendants. (Gaines, Robert) |
Filing 2 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by All Defendants (Gaines, Robert) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Johnny Harris. (Fee of $402 paid, receipt #LIT081731.) Summons issued and returned to Plaintiff for service. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(wbb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.