Brown v. Payne et al
| Jakobe Brown |
| Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Christopher Budnick, Linda Dykes and Percy Arnold |
| 2:2021cv00051 |
| May 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Kristine G Baker |
| J Thomas Ray |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION that Brown's Complaint be DISMISSED, without prejudice; and that the Court CERTIFY, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting this Recommendation would not be taken in good faith. Objections due within 14 days of date of Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 6/28/2021. (csf)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER directing the Clerk to send Brown a prisoner IFP application, along with an institutional trust fund account statement and certificate; directing Brown to either: (a) pay the $402 filing fee for this case; or (2) file a fully completed IFP motion; directing the Clerk to send Plaintiff a copy of the #1 Complaint; and directing Plaintiff to, on or before 6/14/2021, sign the signature page and return it to the Clerk. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 5/13/2021. (kdr)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jakobe Brown.(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
