Huffman v. Mannis et al
| Joseph Huffman |
| Annette Clark, Tabetha Inman, Elkins, Doe, Dean Mannis and Calvin Lewis |
| 2:2021cv00065 |
| June 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Edie R Ervin |
| Brian S Miller |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending Mr. Huffman's claims be dismissed without prejudice based on his failure to comply with the Court's 7/22/21 Order and his failure to prosecute this lawsuit #2 ; Objections due within 14 days of the date of this Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 7/29/21. (tjb)
|
|
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER PLAINTIFFS denying #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; the Clerk is directed to enclose, along with a copy of this Order a new IFP application; within 30 days of this Order, plaintiff must return a completed IFP application including an accompanying affidavit and jail account information sheet, or pay the $402.00 filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 6/22/21. (tjb)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Joseph Huffman.(kdr) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joseph Huffman. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
