Paulman v. Jones et al
| Johnathan Paulman |
| B Spencer, R Robinson, G Miller and D Jones |
| 2:2021cv00068 |
| June 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Edie R Ervin |
| D P Marshall |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to prepare summonses for Defendants D. Jones, G. Miller, B. Spencer, and R. Robinson; and directing the United States Marshal to serve each Defendant with a summons and a copy of #2 Complaint with any attachments, without requiring prepayment of fees and costs or security. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 08/02/2021. (ajt)
|
| Summons Issued as to D Jones, G Miller, R Robinson, B Spencer and forwarded to USMS for service. (ajt) |
| Filing 4 Filing fee: $402 received, receipt number LIT082935 (kth) |
|
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS denying #1 IFP motion, without prejudice; and directing Plaintiff to pay the $402.00 filing fee within 30 days of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 6/25/2021. (jbh)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Johnathan Paulman.(kdr) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Johnathan Paulman. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
