Ellison v. Merck & Co Inc et al
Charlotte Ellison |
Merck & Co Inc and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp |
2:2021cv00133 |
October 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Lee P Rudofsky |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 E-MAIL received from Eastern District of Pennsylvania confirming the case was received and opened in their district as case number 2:21-cv-20124. (kbc) |
Docket Note: Pursuant to #2 Conditional Transfer Order, this case was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania as part of MDL No. 2848, In Re: Zostavax (Zoster Vaccine Live) Products Liability Litigation on this date. (jbh) |
Filing 2 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-88) transferring this case to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania as part of MDL No. 2848, In Re: Zostavax (Zoster Vaccine Live) Products Liability Litigation on this date. Signed by the Clerk of the Court John W. Nichols. (jbh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against all Defendants filed by Charlotte Ellison. (Fee of $ 402 paid, Receipt Number LIT084035.) Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.