Martin v. Yates
| Eric Martin |
| USA and John P Yates |
| 2:2022cv00079 |
| May 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Patricia S Harris |
| James M Moody |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER giving Martin up to, and including, 7/18/2022, to file a reply to #4 Response to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 6/16/2022. (ldb)
|
| Filing 4 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by John P Yates. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Respondent's Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Respondent's Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Respondent's Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit Respondent's Exhibit 4)(Smith, Shannon) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to substitute Yates for the USA as respondent; directing the Clerk of the Court to serve a copy of #1 Martin's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and this Order on Yates by regular mail; and directing Yates to file an answer, motion, or other response to Martin's petition within 21 days after service of the petition, exclusive of the day of service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 05/19/2022. (llg)
|
| Filing 2 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number LIT086792. (kth) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Eric Martin.(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
