Parsons v. Hendrix
Plaintiff: Michael Wayne Parsons
Defendant: USA, Tennessee, State of and DeWayne Hendrix
Case Number: 2:2022cv00098
Filed: June 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Delta Division Office
Presiding Judge: Edie R Ervin
Referring Judge: Lee P Rudofsky
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2022 Filing 7 RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending #1 petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed without prejudice; and directing the Clerk of the Court to change the Respondent to "DeWayne Hendrix, Warden, FCI-Forrest City". Objections due within 14 days of the entry of this Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 7/18/2022. (jbh)
June 2, 2022 Filing 6 Case electronically transferred in from U.S. District Court, Western District of Tennessee; Case Number 2:22-cv-02247. Electronic file copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
June 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TRANSFERRING PETITION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1406(a). Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 06/01/2022. (Norris, Mark) [Transferred from tnwd on 6/2/2022.]
May 27, 2022 Filing 4 Case initiation fee: $ 5.00, receipt number M4676052153 (agj) [Transferred from tnwd on 6/2/2022.]
April 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE AN IN FORMA PAUPERIS AFFIDAVIT AND TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT OR PAY THE HABEAS CORPUS FILING FEE. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 04/20/2022. (Norris, Mark) [Transferred from tnwd on 6/2/2022.]
April 20, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf) [Transferred from tnwd on 6/2/2022.]
April 20, 2022 Filing 1 PRO SE Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2241 filed by Michael Wayne Parsons against The State of Tennessee, The United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Judicial Cards)(csf) [Transferred from tnwd on 6/2/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parsons v. Hendrix
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Wayne Parsons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tennessee, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DeWayne Hendrix
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?