Ellis v. Lay et al
| Jerry James Ellis |
| Gaylon Lay, Anthony Jackson, M Richardson, Chirstoper Johnson, Kenyon Randle, Tyrone Allison, Roosevelt Barden, Valerie Westbrook, T Nelson, Kathy Baxter, J Young, A Medley, C Smith and S Watts |
| 2:2022cv00107 |
| June 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Joe J Volpe |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 OBJECTIONS to #10 Order, by Jerry James Ellis. (ldb) |
Filing 12
RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION that the amended complaint be dismissed without prejudice, and this case be closed #5 . The Court certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from an order adopting this recommendation and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of this recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 8/2/2022. (lej)
|
| Filing 11 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Jerry James Ellis re #8 Docket Entry Filed in Error, Notice of Docket Correction re #8 Correspondence. (fjg) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER denying Plaintiff's IFP Application pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) #4 . Plaintiff must submit to the Clerk the statutory filing fee of $402, in full, within 21 days of the date of this order. Failure to do so will result in a recommendations that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 6/28/2022. (lej)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #5 Amended Complaint. CORRECTION: The original document was attached in error (wrong image file) due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office. The correct document was added to docket entry #5 and is attached hereto for review by the parties.(jak) |
| Filing 8 DOCKET ENTRY FILED IN ERROR - DISREGARD (hml) (Docket text modified on 6/22/2022 to indicate the document was filed in error)(jak) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #8 Correspondence. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to indicate the document was filed in error pursuant to instruction from Chambers. (jak) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Jerry James Ellis. (llg) |
|
Filing 6
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying Plaintiff's motion for copies #3 . Plaintiff's complaint was filed as requested. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 6/21/2022. (lej)
|
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Jerry James Ellis. (ldb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/24/2022: #1 Main Document - Correct) (jak). |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jerry James Ellis. (ldb) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Copies by Jerry James Ellis. (kdr) |
|
Filing 2
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER that the Clerk shall reassign this case to the Delta Division. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 6/13/2022. (lej)
|
| Docket Note: Pursuant to 2 Order, this case was transferred to the Delta Division of the Eastern District of Arkansas and assigned case number 2:22-cv-00107 LPR-JJV. (jak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Jerry James Ellis. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
