Johnson v. Arkansas, State of
| James Johnson, III |
| Arkansas, State of |
| 2:2022cv00109 |
| June 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Brian S Miller |
| Joe J Volpe |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that unless Petitioner either pays the $5 filing fee or files a statement regarding his inability to do so during the 14 day objection period, this cause of action should be dismissed without prejudice #2 . Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of this recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 8/2/2022. (lej) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #5 Order. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to indicate the #1 Motion for Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied without prejudice as marked on the Order. (jak) |
Filing 5
ORDER denying without prejudice Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #1 . Before proceeding further, Mr. Johnson must either pay the entire $5 filing fee or provide the Court with a statement about why he is unable to pay the filing fee within 30 days of the date of this order. His failure to do so may result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 6/15/2022. (lej) (Docket text modified on 6/17/2022 to correct the description of the document filed)(jak)
|
|
Filing 4
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying Petitioner's motion to appoint counsel #3 . A civil litigant does not have a constitutional or statutory right to appointed counsel in a habeas action but the Court may appoint counsel at its discretion. The Court has considered Petitioner's need for an attorney at this juncture, the likelihood that he will benefit from assistance of counsel, the factual complexity of the case, the Petitioner's ability to investigate and present the case, and the complexity of the legal issues. In considering these factors, the Court finds that, at this time, Petitioner's claims do not appear legally or factually complex, and it appears from the face of the pleadings, Petitioner is capable of prosecuting these claims without appointed counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 6/14/2022. (lej)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by James Johnson, III. (kdr) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by James Johnson, III.(kdr) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James Johnson, III. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. Arkansas, State of | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Johnson, III | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Arkansas, State of | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
