Lewis v. Rechcigl
| Arron Michael Lewis |
| Greg Rechcigl |
| 2:2022cv00127 |
| July 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Patricia S Harris |
| D P Marshall |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER. Lewis' motions, Doc. Nos. #4 & #5 , are granted in part and denied in part. Lewis indicates he has not received a copy of his complaint, with an attached manuscript, or anything else from the Court related to this case. His complaint and attachment, along with a Court order and an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) were mailed to Lewis on July 16, 2022. His motions are dated July 26, 2022, and August 4, 2022. He should eventually receive the legal mail sent by the Court. Because the attachment to Lewis' complaint is almost 200 pages long, the Court will not resend it at this time. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Lewis another IFP application, a copy of the Court's Order (Doc. No. #2 ), and a copy of his complaint without the attachment (Doc. No. #1 ). Lewis has until September 30, 2022, to pay the filing fee or submit a complete IFP application. His failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 8/18/2022. (cfd)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Copies and Extension of Time by Arron Michael Lewis. (kdr) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Copies and MOTION for Extension of Time by Arron Michael Lewis. (ldb) |
|
Filing 3
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER. The Clerk of Court is directed to remove pages 4-190 from the Plaintiffs complaint and file those pages under seal as an attachment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 07/18/2022. (dml)
|
|
Filing 2
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER PLAINTIFFS directing the Plaintiff to return a completed IFP application, including an accompanying certificate and calculation sheet, or pay the $402.00 filing and administrative fees within 30 days of the date of this order; and directing the Clerk of Court to enclose an IFP application along with a copy of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 7/18/2022. (ldb)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Greg Rechcigl, filed by Arron Michael Lewis.(kdr) (Document replaced on 7/18/2022 with attachments filed under seal pursuant to 3 Order.)(cmn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lewis v. Rechcigl | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Arron Michael Lewis | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Greg Rechcigl | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
