Carr v. Tri-National Inc et al
Jackie Renea Carr |
Tri-National Inc and Juan Manuel Ramos, Jr |
2:2022cv00148 |
August 24, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Brian S Miller |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 11/9/2022; Rule 26(f) Report due by 11/22/2022; Jury Trial proposed for sometime during the week of 3/4/2024 at 9:30 a.m. in Helena Courtroom #314 before Judge Brian S. Miller. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 9/1/2022. (ljb) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Tri-National Inc (Jones, Gregory) |
Filing 4 Deficiency Letter from the Clerk of Court re #1 Notice of Removal, notifying party that a Corporate Disclosure Statement was not filed with first appearance, pleading, petition, motion response, or other request (F.R.Cv.P. 7.1) (kdr) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #2 Complaint by Juan Manuel Ramos, Jr and Tri-National Inc.(kdr) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Jackie Renea Carr.(kdr) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Juan Manuel Ramos, Jr and Tri-National Inc from Crittenden County Circuit Court, Case Number 18CV-22-506. Fee of $402 paid, Receipt Number LIT088020. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.