Ellis v. Payne
| John Johnson Ellis |
| M Richardson and Dexter Payne |
| 2:2022cv00150 |
| August 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Brian S Miller |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Joe J Volpe |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 28
OBJECTION to #23 Report and Recommendations by John Johnson Ellis. (kdr)
|
|
Filing 27
OBJECTION to #23 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by John Johnson Ellis. (ldb)
|
|
Filing 26
MOTION for Status Update by John Johnson Ellis. (ldb)
|
|
Filing 25
PRO SE MOTION for Order by John Johnson Ellis. (ldb)
|
|
Filing 24
PRO SE MOTION for Summary Judgment by John Johnson Ellis. (ldb)
|
|
Filing 23
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed and the requested relief be denied #2 . No certificate of appealability be issued. Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of this recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 10/5/2022. (lej)
|
|
Filing 22
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by John Johnson Ellis. (ldb)
|
|
Filing 21
PRO SE MOTION for Summary Judgment by John Johnson Ellis. (ldb)
|
|
Filing 20
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by John Johnson Ellis. (ldb)
|
|
Filing 19
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis for the same reasons previously stated #17 13 #16 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 9/26/2022. (lej)
|
|
Filing 18
ADDENDUM to #14 Affidavit filed by John Johnson Ellis. (llg)
|
|
Filing 17
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by John Johnson Ellis. (llg)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER denying without prejudice #15 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Before proceeding further, Mr. Ellis must either pay the entire $5 filing fee or provide the Court with a statement about why he is unable to pay the filling fee within 30 days of the date of this order. His failure to do so may result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 9/20/2022. (lej)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by John Johnson Ellis. (kdr)
|
|
Filing 14
AFFIDAVIT by John Johnson Ellis. (kdr)
|
|
Filing 13
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER: Petitioner has filed numerous motions seeking miscellaneous relief. Petitioner's request to amend the name of the Respondent to - Dexter Payne, Director of the Division of Correction - is granted #11 . All other requests are denied #7 #8 #9 #10 . Based on the fact that Petitioner has adequate funds in his Trust Account, I ordered Petitioner to either pay the entire $5 filing fee or provide the Court with a statement about why he is unable to pay the filing fee. (Doc. No. 1 at 3 and Doc. No. 4.) Accordingly, Petitioner should pay the $5 filing fee or explain why he cannot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 9/13/2022. (lej)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #10 Motion. CORRECTION: The original document was attached to the docket in error (no case number) due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office. The correct document was added as an attachment to #10 docket entry and is attached hereto for service/review by the parties. (cmn)
|
|
Filing 11
AMENDED MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief by John Johnson Ellis. (llg)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief by John Johnson Ellis. (llg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/12/2022: #1 Main Document - Correct) (cmn).
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief by John Johnson Ellis. (llg)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief by John Johnson Ellis. (llg)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief by John Johnson Ellis. (llg)
|
|
Filing 6
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT. Based on #5 Order, the Clerk's office has reassigned the case to Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. (cmn)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER directing the clerk to immediately transfer this case to the Honorable Lee P. Rudofsky. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 9/2/2022. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER denying #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Before proceeding further, Mr. Ellis must either pay the entire $5 filing fee or provide the Court with a statement about why he is unable to pay the filing fee within 30 days of the date of this order. His failure to do so may result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 8/30/2022. (lej)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #2 Petition. CORRECTION: The original document was attached to the docket in error (missing page) due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office. The correct document was added as an attachment to #2 docket entry and is attached hereto for service/review by the parties. (cmn)
|
|
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #1 Motion. CORRECTION: The docket entry was modified to correct the date filed as 8/29/2022 as marked on the document.(cmn)
|
|
Filing 2
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by John Johnson Ellis. (llg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/30/2022: #1 Main Document - Correct) (cmn).
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by John Johnson Ellis. (llg) (Docket entry modified on 8/30/2022 to correct date filed.)(cmn)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
