Block v. Kerstine et al
| Keith Block |
| Kerstine, Tracy Bennett, Emma Hatchett and A Culclager |
| 2:2022cv00184 |
| October 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Edie R Ervin |
| James M Moody |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Keith Block. (kdr) |
| Filing 4 RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending Mr. Block's complaint be dismissed, without prejudice; and recommending the Clerk be instructed to close this case. Objections due within 14 days of the date of this Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 11/7/2022. (jbh) |
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS denying #1 IFP motion; directing the Clerk to enclose a new IFP application, along with a copy of this Order; and directing Plaintiff to return a completed IFP application, including an accompanying affidavit and jail account information sheet, or pay the $402.00 filing fee, within 30 days of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 10/4/2022. (jbh)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Keith Block. (ldb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Keith Block. (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
