Hill v. McCradic et al
Christopher Tyler Hill |
Tyran McCradic, Clayton Jackson, Arkansas County, Dean Mannis and Doe |
2:2022cv00211 |
November 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
James M Moody |
Joe J Volpe |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants.(kdr) |
Filing 4 EXHIBITS by Christopher Tyler Hill. (kdr) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting Plaintiff's IFP Application #1 . The Clerk shall mail a copy of this order to the Arkansas County Detention Center Jail Administrator. Service is not appropriate at this time. The Clerk shall mail a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint form (but not an IFP Application or Calculation Sheet) to Plaintiff with a copy of this order. If Plaintiff wishes to amend the complaint, he must complete the new complaint form in its entirety in accordance with this order, label it an "Amended Complaint," and file it within 30 days of the date of this order. Plaintiff's complaint, as it now stands, is partially deficient and some of his claims may be dismissed after 30 days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 12/8/2022. (lej) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Christopher Tyler Hill. (ldb) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher Tyler Hill. (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.