Stinson v. Does
| Mark Stinson, Sr |
| Does Unknown BOP Medical Staff, FCI Forrest City, AR |
| 2:2022cv00218 |
| December 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Kristine G Baker |
| Jerome T Kearney |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 26
NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL and NOA SUPPLEMENT as to #25 Notice of Appeal. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 25
NOTICE OF APPEAL by Mark Stinson, Sr. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER of USCA as to #24 USCA Docketing Letter as to Petition for Writ of Mandamus. The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Mr. Stinson is hereby directed to pay the full filing fee to the clerk of the U.S. District Court no later than 2/27/2023. No further action will be taken in this case until the filing fee is paid in full. Failure to pay the fee will result in dismissal of this appeal without further notice. (jbh) (Docket text modified on 1/26/2023 to correct the description of the document filed) (jak)
|
|
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #23 USCA Order. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to correct the description of the document filed as "ORDER of USCA as to #24 USCA Docketing Letter as to Petition for Writ of Mandamus. The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Mr. Stinson is hereby directed to pay the full filing fee to the clerk of the U.S. District Court no later than 2/27/2023. No further action will be taken in this case until the filing fee is paid in full. Failure to pay the fee will result in dismissal of this appeal without further notice." (jak)
|
|
Filing 24
USCA Docketing Letter. Petition for Writ of Mandamus has been filed and assigned case number 23-1110. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 22
MOTION for Expedited Summons by Mark Stinson, Sr. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 21
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying #5 Motion for Summary Judgment. This Motion is premature. The Complaint has not yet been screened under the PLRA. Only after screening and (potential) service would a summary judgment motion be appropriate. Even then, summary judgment is not usual until the close of discovery. This denial is without prejudice to refiling the Motion at an appropriate time. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 1/17/2023. (hml)
|
|
Filing 20
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER finding as moot #7 Motion to Submit Writ of Mandamus. This Motion is moot in light of the Order and Judgment from the 8th Circuit, dated December 27, 2022. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 1/17/2023. (hml)
|
|
Cases associated. Create association to 2:22-cv-00154-LPR. Pursuant to 14 Order docketed in 2:22-cv-00154-LPR. (ldb)
|
|
Filing 19
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #17 USCA Order. CORRECTION: The original document was attached to the docket in error (wrong image file) due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office. The correct document was added as an attachment to #17 docket entry and is attached hereto for service/review by the parties. (cmn)
|
|
Filing 18
USCA JUDGMENT: The petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER of USCA: The mandamus petitions in Nos. 22-5942, 22-5945, and 22-5946 are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, the remaining mandamus petitions are denied, and the motions to proceed in forma pauperis are denied as moot. No mandate to issue. (jbh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/28/2022: #1 Main Document - Correct) (cmn).
|
|
Filing 16
USCA JUDGMENT as to #8 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal: The appeal is dismissed. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER of USCA as to #8 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal: Stinson's appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 14
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT. Based on #13 Order, the Clerk's office has reassigned the case to Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. (jak)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to transfer this case to the Honorable Lee P. Rudofsky. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 12/12/2022. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 12
Case electronically transferred in from U.S. District Court, Western District of Tennessee, Case Number 2:22-cv-02618. Electronic file copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER OF TRANSFER, signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 12/02/2022. (Mays, Samuel) [Transferred from tnwd on 12/6/2022.]
|
|
Filing 10
Motion to Transfer Case Pursuant to 28: U.S.C. 1406(a) filed by Mark Stinson, Sr. (mlk) [Transferred from tnwd on 12/6/2022.]
|
|
Filing 9
USCA Case Number 22-5977 for #8 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal filed by Mark Stinson, Sr. Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Mark T. Stinson, Sr. Transcript needed: n. (csf) [Transferred from tnwd on 12/6/2022.]
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL by Mark Stinson, Sr. (csf) [Transferred from tnwd on 12/6/2022.]
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Submit Writ of Mandamus by Mark Stinson, Sr. (agj) [Transferred from tnwd on 12/6/2022.]
|
|
Filing 6
USCA NOTICE: The petition for writ of mandamus has been docketed as case number 22-5946 with the caption listed above. (agj) [Transferred from tnwd on 12/6/2022.]
|
|
Filing 5
PRO SE MOTION for Summary Judgment by Mark Stinson, Sr. (jae) [Transferred from tnwd on 12/6/2022.]
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 10/03/2022. (Mays, Samuel) [Transferred from tnwd on 12/6/2022.]
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf) [Transferred from tnwd on 12/6/2022.]
|
|
Filing 2
Pro Se MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mark Stinson, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Accompanying Motion)(csf) [Transferred from tnwd on 12/6/2022.]
|
|
Filing 1
PRO SE COMPLAINT for Violation of Civil Rights Under 28 U.S.C. 1331 Bivens Act against Unknown BOP Medical Staff, filed by Mark Stinson, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Judicial Cards)(csf) [Transferred from tnwd on 12/6/2022.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stinson v. Does | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mark Stinson, Sr | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Does Unknown BOP Medical Staff, FCI Forrest City, AR | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
