Edwards v. Navajo Express Inc et al
| Arthur Edwards |
| Navajo Express Inc and Eddie Williams |
| 2:2023cv00006 |
| January 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Kristine G Baker |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #6 Answer. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to establish linkage to #2 Complaint. (jak) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #2 Complaint by Eddie Williams.(Deacon, Joseph) (Docket text modified on 2/13/2023 to establish linkage) (jak) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #2 Complaint by Navajo Express Inc, Eddie Williams.(Deacon, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Navajo Express Inc (Deacon, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 Deficiency Letter from Clerk of Court re #1 Notice of Removal notifying party that a Corporate Disclosure Statement or Diversity Disclosure Statement was not filed with first appearance, pleading, petition, motion response, or other request (F.R.Cv.P. 7.1). (jbh) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Arthur Edwards. (jbh) |
| Filing 1 JOINT NOTICE OF REMOVAL AND JURY DEMAND by Navajo Express Inc, Eddie Williams from St. Francis County Circuit Court, case number 62CV-22-00303-2. Fee of $402 paid; receipt number LIT583. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jbh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
