Nichols v. Rivers et al
Billy Mack Nichols, Jr |
C Rivers, Tracy Bennett, Paul Gates, WellPath, Allison, Moses Jackson, Richardson and Dexter Payne |
2:2023cv00021 |
January 30, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Edie R Ervin |
Brian S Miller |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 JUDICIAL NOTICE to the Court and Supplemental/Additional Pleading by Billy Mack Nichols, Jr. (kdr) |
Filing 15 RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending that Mr. Nichols' claims be dismissed, without prejudice. Objections due within 14 days of the date of this Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 3/15/2023. (ldb) |
Filing 14 ORDER directing the Clerk to recharacterize #12 motion as a motion to reconsider denial of request to proceed IFP; denying #12 motion to reconsider; and reminding Mr. Nichols that he must pay the $402 filing and administrative fee in order to proceed with this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 3/7/2023. (jbh) |
Filing 13 JUDICIAL NOTICE to the Court by Billy Mack Nichols, Jr. (llg) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Reconsider Denial of Request to Proceed IFP by Billy Mack Nichols, Jr. (llg)[DOCKET ENTRY MODIFIED TO CORRECT THE FILING EVENT PER #14 ORDER] (jak) |
Filing 11 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #10 Motion for Copies. The Clerk of Court is directed to provide Mr. Nichols copies of docket entries 1-3 and docket entries 6-8. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 03/01/2023. (smp) |
Filing 10 AMENDED MOTION for Copies by Billy Mack Nichols, Jr. (kdr) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #5 motion for copies; denying #5 motion for extension of time without prejudice; and directing the Clerk of the Court to send Mr. Nichols copies of Docs. #1 - #3 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 2/16/2023. (jbh) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #7 Brief in Support. CORRECTION: The original document was attached in error (lack of case number) due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office. The correct document was added to docket entry #7 and is attached hereto for review by the parties. (jak) |
Filing 7 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #6 Addendum to #2 Complaint filed by Billy Mack Nichols, Jr. (kdr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/15/2023: #1 Main Document - Correct) (jak). |
Filing 6 ADDENDUM to #2 Complaint All Defendants, filed by Billy Mack Nichols, Jr.(kdr) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Copies and Motion for Extension of Time by Billy Mack Nichols, Jr. (kdr) |
Filing 4 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS denying #1 IFP motion; and directing Plaintiff to pay the $402.00 filing fee within 30 days of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 2/7/2023. (jbh) |
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #2 Complaint. CORRECTION: The docket entry was modified to correct the file date as 1/30/2023 as marked on the document. (jak) |
Filing 3 BRIEF IN SUPPORT of #2 Complaint filed by Billy Mack Nichols, Jr. (llg) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Billy Mack Nichols, Jr. (llg) (Docket entry modified on 2/6/2023 to correct the file date)(jak) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Billy Mack Nichols, Jr. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.