Stinson v. Yates et al
| Mark T Stinson, Sr |
| John P Yates, Blair, Rendon, B Crawford and Randle |
| 2:2023cv00091 |
| April 6, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Brian S Miller |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 USCA Docketing Letter. Petition for Writ of Mandamus has been filed and assigned case number 23-2346. (jbh) |
Filing 6
ORDER denying #5 Mark Stinson's motion for expedited reconsideration. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/30/2023. (ljb)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Expedited Reconsideration and Summons re #3 #4 by Mark T Stinson, Sr. (jap) |
|
Filing 4
JUDGMENT: Consistent with #3 order entered today, this case is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/8/2023. (ljb)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 Mark Stinson's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and dismissing this case with prejudice on res judicata grounds. An in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/8/2023. (ljb)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Mark T Stinson, Sr.(kdr) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mark T Stinson, Sr. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
