Starr v. Moody et al
| David Lee Starr |
| Moody, Gary R Kerstein, Gragoey Rachigl, WellPath, James Dycus and Dexter Payne |
| 2:2023cv00129 |
| June 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jerome T Kearney |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER denying #5 Plaintiff David Lee Starr's Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 06/29/2023. (lmc)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by David Lee Starr. (llg) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER ON AMICUS BRIEFS. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 3/21/2023. (ldb)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; and directing the Clerk to forward a copy of this Order to the Warden of the Grimes Unit of the ADC, the ADC Trust Fund Centralized Banking Office, and the ADC Compliance Office. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 6/9/2023. (ldb)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by David Lee Starr. (ldb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by David Lee Starr. (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
