Faulkner v. Garrett
Plaintiff: Michael Blaine Faulkner
Defendant: Doe and C Garrett
Case Number: 2:2023cv00210
Filed: October 16, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Benecia B Moore
Referring Judge: J Thomas Ray
2 Judge: Lee P Rudofsky
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE, CONSENT AND REFERENCE to a Magistrate Judge forwarded by the Clerk of Court. (kdr)
November 15, 2023 Filing 7 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by C Garrett. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Smith, Shannon)
November 6, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Reggie Koch on behalf of Michael Blaine Faulkner (Koch, Reggie)
November 2, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT. The Clerk's office has reassigned the referral of this case to Magistrate Judge Benecia B. Moore. Signed at the direction of the Court on 11/2/2023.(jak)
October 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to serve a copy of #1 Petition, #2 Memorandum, and this Order on Respondent and the United States Attorney by mail; directing Respondent to file a responsive pleading to the Petition within 21 days of service; and directing the Clerk of the Court to update the docket sheet to reflect that Petitioner Faulkner's current custodian, C. Garrett, Warden, FCI-Forrest City, is the proper Respondent in this matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 10/25/2023. (kdr)
October 17, 2023 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and #2 Memorandum in Support. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to correct the party filer name as Michael Blaine Faulkner as marked on the document. (jak)
October 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER ON AMICUS BRIEFS. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 3/21/2023. (ldb)
October 16, 2023 Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in Support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Michael Blaine Faulkner. (ldb) (Docket text modified on 10/17/2023 to correct the party filer name)(jak)
October 16, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Michael Blaine Faulkner. (Fee of $5 paid, receipt # LIT3947.) (ldb) (Docket text modified on 10/17/2023 to correct the party filer name) (jak)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Faulkner v. Garrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Blaine Faulkner
Represented By: Reggie Koch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C Garrett
Represented By: Shannon S. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?