Jones v. Mississippi Limestone Corporation
Bobby L Jones |
Mississippi Limestone Corporation |
2:2023cv00218 |
October 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Brian S Miller |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Laurie White Harrison on behalf of Bobby L Jones (Harrison, Laurie) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #4 Notice of Appearance. CORRECTION: The original document was submitted in error (editable image file). The correct document was added to docket entry #4 based on the attached correspondence. (jak) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #2 Notice of Appearance. CORRECTION: The original document was submitted in editable image file format. The correct document was added to docket entry #2 based on the attached correspondence. (jak) |
Filing 5 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 2/6/2024; Rule 26(f) Report due by 2/20/2024; Bench Trial proposed for sometime during the week of 5/12/2025 at 9:30 a.m. in Helena Courtroom #314 before Judge Brian S. Miller. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 11/29/2023. (ljb) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Harper Lee Kiefer on behalf of Mississippi Limestone Corporation (Kiefer, Harper) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/29/2023: #1 Main Document - Correct (submitted 11/29/2023)) (jak). |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Mississippi Limestone Corporation.(Campbell, Phil) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Phil W. Campbell on behalf of Mississippi Limestone Corporation (Campbell, Phil) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/29/2023: #1 Main Document - Correct (submitted 11/29/2023)) (jak). |
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) DOCKET NOTE: This case is assigned to the docket of United States District Judge Brian S. Miller. Magistrate Judge Benecia B. Moore is now associated to this case due to the retirement of Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 11/1/2023.(jak) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mississippi Limestone Corporation, filed by Bobby L Jones. Filing Fee of $402 paid. Receipt Number LIT1064. Summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jones v. Mississippi Limestone Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Bobby L Jones | |
Represented By: | Christopher Wesley Burks |
Represented By: | Laurie White Harrison |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Mississippi Limestone Corporation | |
Represented By: | Harper Lee Kiefer |
Represented By: | Phil W. Campbell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.