Pulliam v. Rash
Plaintiff: Cheezy Pulliam
Defendant: Earnest Chad Rash
Case Number: 2:2024cv00148
Filed: August 14, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Brian S Miller
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgement
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2024 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by David M. Fuqua on behalf of Earnest Chad Rash (Fuqua, David)
September 26, 2024 Filing 11 FINAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial set for sometime during the week of 2/9/2026 at 9:30 a.m. in Helena Courtroom #314 before Judge Brian S. Miller. Joinder of Parties due by 8/18/2025; Discovery due by 9/17/2025; Motions due by 10/14/2025; Pretrial Disclosure Sheet due by 1/9/2026. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 9/26/2024. (ljb)
September 26, 2024 Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Earnest Chad Rash. (Adams, Jenna)
August 16, 2024 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Margaret Diane Depper on behalf of Earnest Chad Rash (Depper, Margaret)
August 16, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Harper Lee Kiefer on behalf of Earnest Chad Rash (Kiefer, Harper)
August 14, 2024 Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Earnest Chad Rash.(Stevens, Christopher)
August 14, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE by Earnest Chad Rash re #1 Notice of Removal Consent to Removal (Stevens, Christopher)
August 14, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Stevens on behalf of Earnest Chad Rash (Stevens, Christopher)
August 14, 2024 Filing 4 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 10/22/2024; Rule 26(f) Report due by 11/4/2024; Jury Trial proposed for sometime during the week of 2/9/2026 at 9:30 a.m. in Helena Courtroom #314. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 8/14/2024. (ljb)(Docket text modified on 8/14/2024 to correct the signature of the Order)(jak)
August 14, 2024 Filing 3 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Earnest Chad Rash. (ajj)
August 14, 2024 Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Earnest Chad Rash filed by Cheezy Pulliam. (ajj)
August 14, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Earnest Chad Rash from Crittenden County Circuit Court, case number 18CV-24-00501. Fee of $405 paid. Receipt Number LIT7484. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ajj)
August 14, 2024 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #4 Initial Scheduling Order. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to correct the signature of the Order as "Signed at the Direction of the Court" as marked on the Order. (jak)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pulliam v. Rash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Earnest Chad Rash
Represented By: Christopher Stevens
Represented By: Jenna Adams
Represented By: Margaret Diane Depper
Represented By: Harper Lee Kiefer
Represented By: David M. Fuqua
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cheezy Pulliam
Represented By: Luther Oneal Sutter
Represented By: Lucien R. Gillham
Represented By: Caleb Baumgardner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?