Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Miracle 2000 Community Development Corp et al
| Joe Hand Promotions Inc |
| Miracle 2000 Community Development Corp doing business as Blackberry Molasses, Altoria Brisbon, Marco McClendon and Derrick Clay |
| 2:2024cv00185 |
| October 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Kristine G Baker |
| Cable/Satellite TV |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 RESPONSE to Motion re #4 MOTION to Dismiss Party Marco McClendon, Altoria Brisbon and Derrick Clay filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit signed waivers)(Finch, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Party by Marco McClendon, Altoria Brisbon, Derrick Clay (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E)(Donaldson, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Franklin Donaldson, Jr on behalf of Marco McClendon, Altoria Brisbon, Derrick Clay (Donaldson, Thomas) |
| Summons Issued as to All Defendants and returned to counsel for service. (fjg) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Joe Hand Promotions Inc. (jbh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Joe Hand Promotions Inc. No summons issued. (Fee of $405 paid. Receipt Number LIT8124.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jbh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
