Harris v. Davis et al
| Paul Harris |
| Davis, White, Grime, Watson, Newson, Hawks and Lane |
| 2:2026cv00022 |
| February 9, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Brian S Miller |
| Joe J Volpe |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER that the Clerk shall prepare summonses and the USMS shall serve Defendants Watson and Newson without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 4/6/2026. (lej)
|
| Filing 10 PARTIAL RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION that Plaintiff be allowed to proceed with his 1/7/2026 excessive force claim against Defendants Newson and Watson. All other claims, as well as Defendants Davis, White, Grime, Hawks, and Lane be dismissed without prejudice. Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of this recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 4/6/2026. (lej) |
| Summons Issued as to Newson, Watson and forwarded to the U.S. Marshal for service. (jbh) |
|
Filing 9
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying #8 Motion for Copies. This is Plaintiff's second Motion for Copies in less than a month. But it appears he has received what the Court has mailed him as he has been granted status to proceed IFP. And no hearing is necessary at this time. Motion for Hearing #8 is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 3/16/2026. (lej)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Copies and MOTION for Hearing by Paul Harris. (ldb) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall mail a copy of this order to the East Arkansas Regional Unit Warden, ADC Trust Bank, and ADC Compliance Office. Service is not appropriate at this time. The Clerk shall mail a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint form (but not an IFP Application) to Plaintiff with a copy of this order. If Plaintiff wishes to amend the complaint, he must complete the new complaint form in its entirety in accordance with this order, label it an "Amended Complaint," and file it within 30 days of the date of this order. If Plaintiff does not timely and properly do so, some or all of his claims may be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 2/25/2026. (lej)
|
|
Filing 6
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #4 Motion for Copies. The Clerk shall mail Plaintiff a docket sheet. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 2/24/2026. (lej)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Paul Harris. (ldb) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Copies by Paul Harris. (ldb) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER denying #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall mail Plaintiff an IFP Application and a Calculation Sheet. Plaintiff must, within 30 days of the date of this order, either: (a) pay the full $405 filing fee; or (b) file a properly completed IFP Application and Calculation Sheet. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 2/12/2026. (lej)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Paul Harris. (ajs) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Paul Harris. (ajs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
