Truong v. Lucas et al
| Diem Truong |
| Kjell John Lucas, Diesel Auto Express LLC and Does John Does 1-3, John Does Entities 1-3 |
| 2:2026cv00044 |
| March 23, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| D P Marshall |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Report due by 6/8/2026. Jury Trial set for 9/28/2027 at 9:30 AM in Helena Courtroom 314 before Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. Signed at the direction of the Court on 4/24/2026. (slb) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Diesel Auto Express LLC (Fairley, John) |
| Filing 4 Deficiency Letter from Clerk of Court re #1 Notice of Removal notifying party that a Corporate Disclosure Statement was not filed with first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request (F.R.Cv.P. 7.1). (jak) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Diesel Auto Express LLC. (ajs)(Docket text modified on 3/24/2026 to correct a typographical error) (jak) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Diem Truong. (ajs) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Diesel Auto Express LLC, Kjell John Lucas from Monroe County Circuit Court, case number 48CV-26-3. Fee of $405 paid. Receipt Number LIT14029. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ajs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.