Jones v. Beefield et al
| Boren Carder Jones |
| Jessica Beefield, Tierman and Does Nurses, Doctors, Providers, Wellpath, Omega Sanction Center |
| 2:2026cv00055 |
| April 9, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Kristine G Baker |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 E-MAIL received from U.S. District Court Western District of Arkansas, confirming the case was received and opened in their district as case number 6:26-cv-06041. (jak) |
Filing 3
ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to immediately transfer Plaintiff's entire case file to the Western District of Arkansas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 4/16/2026. (ldb)
|
| Docket Note: Case transferred to the Western District of Arkansas on this date. (ldb) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #2 Complaint. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to include reference to the Jury demand as marked on the document. (jak) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury demand against All Defendants, filed by Boren Carder Jones. (ldb) (Docket text modified on 4/10/2026 to include reference to the Jury demand) (jak) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Boren Carder Jones. (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
