Hovick v. Randle et al
Plaintiff: Dylan Joseph Hovick
Defendant: Normadi C Randle, Todd Ball, Randle and Steven Ricketts
Case Number: 2:2026cv00162
Filed: October 15, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Edie R Ervin
Referring Judge: Lee P Rudofsky
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER ON AMICUS BRIEFS. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 10/15/2026. (llg)
October 15, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 4 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; directing the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this Order to the appropriate ADC offices and the Warden of the East Regional Unit; directing the Clerk of Court to prepare a summons for defendant Normadi C. Radle; and directing the US Marshal to serve defendant Radle with a summons and a copy of the complaint with any attachments, without requiring prepayment of fees and costs of security. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 10/15/2026. (amk) (Docket text modified on 10/15/2026 to correct the description of the document filed) (jak)
October 15, 2026 Filing 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order by Dylan Joseph Hovick. (llg)
October 15, 2026 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Dylan Joseph Hovick. (llg)
October 15, 2026 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dylan Joseph Hovick. (llg)
October 15, 2026 Summons Issued as to Normadi C Randle and forwarded to the US Marshal for service. (amk)
October 15, 2026 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #4 Order. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to correct the description of the document filed as "INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS" as marked on the Order. (jak)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hovick v. Randle et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dylan Joseph Hovick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Normadi C Randle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Todd Ball
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Randle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven Ricketts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?