House et al v. Conseco Insurance Group
3:2006cv00067 |
April 24, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Jonesboro Office |
Susan Webber Wright |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 145 ORDER granting 144 Plaintiff's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss without prejudice. As a condition to refiling this action, plaintiffs will be required to reimburse Defendant any reasonable costs it will incur in having to duplicate matters from this action. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 1/5/09. (jct) |
Filing 120 ORDER denying as moot 115 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 12/11/08. (jct) |
Filing 117 ORDER, re 115 Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel, Defendant's response deadline is extended to & including 12/8/08. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 12/4/08. (jct) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting 7 Motion for Limited Admission/Pro Hac Vice of Charles E. Griffin, granting 8 Motion for Limited Admission/Pro Hac Vice of Jacob M. Jenkins & granting 9 Motion for Limited Admission/Pro Hac Vice of Howard R. Brown, for Deft Conseco Insurance Group. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 4/27/06. (jct) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: House et al v. Conseco Insurance Group | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.