All-Ways Logistics Inc v. USA Truck Inc et al
| 3:2006cv00087 |
| May 22, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Susan Webber Wright |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
242
ORDER, pursuant to 240 Plaintiff's Satisfaction of Judgment, granting 241 Defendants' MOTION for Release of Bond Obligation. The Clerk is ordered to maintain the original letter of credit and amendments under seal (to the extent they remain so) until USA Truck, Inc. & USA Logistics retrieve these papers. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 10/20/09. (jct)
|
|
Filing
233
ORDER granting 229 Motion to renew and increase supersedeas bond to $5,500,000 ; granting 231 Motion to supplement bond and to continue stay of execution on judgment to the extent it only seeks to extend the letter of credit by one year and the Court additionally grants the motion to continue stay of execution on the amended judgment and this Court's December 2007 postjudgment order pending the 8th Circuit's resolution of the USA's appeal. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 8/26/09. (dac)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: All-Ways Logistics Inc v. USA Truck Inc et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
