Church et al v. Annett Holdings Inc et al
Kelly Church and Brian Church |
Annett Holdings Inc and Gabriel Rodriguez |
3:2007cv00033 |
March 26, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Jonesboro Office |
Craighead |
Susan Webber Wright |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 110 JUDGMENT re 108 109 Jury Verdicts; Jury Verdict in favor of Kelly Church in the amount of $1,100,000.00 and Brian Church in the amount of $25,000.00 against Annett Holdings Inc; pursuant to the stipulation filed, defendant is entitled to a credit in the amount of $19,944.35 against the judgment. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 11/21/08. (mkf) |
Filing 91 ORDER granting 58 Defendant's First Motion in Limine & Plaintiffs will be precluded from introducing evidence of the amount written off by the medical care providers; denying 65 Defendant's Second Motion in Limine regarding opening sta tement or closing argument on "per diem" or "unit of time" argument for plaintiff Kelly Church's pain & suffering; denying without prejudice to renew 68 Defendant's Third Motion in Limine regarding Brian Church's employment; denying 70 Defendant's Fourth Motion in Limine regarding evidence involving the plaintiffs' children. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 11/12/08. (jct) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.