Jackson v. Hino Motors Manufacturing USA Inc

Plaintiff: Terrence Jackson
Defendant: Hino Motors Manufacturing USA Inc
Case Number: 3:2007cv00104
Filed: July 30, 2007
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Jonesboro Office
County: Out of State
Presiding Judge: J. Leon Holmes
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 17, 2009 32 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DISMISSING CASE, and appeal, with prejudice, pursuant to 31 Stipulation of Dismissal. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 3/17/09. (jct)
September 25, 2008 25 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DENYING 4 Motion to Dismiss; DENYING 4 Motion to Stay & Compel Arbitration. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 9/25/08. (jct)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. Hino Motors Manufacturing USA Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terrence Jackson
Represented By: John W. Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hino Motors Manufacturing USA Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?