Edgar v. Langston et al
Jeremy Wayne Edgar |
Dan Langston, Tim Cavness, Ron Harvey, Aron Gamber, Tim Long, John Anderson and Does |
3:2008cv00068 |
April 25, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Jonesboro Office |
Greene |
J. Leon Holmes |
H. David Young |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 77 JUDGMENT re 76 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, Order on Report and Recommendations; Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 1/27/09. (mkf) |
Filing 73 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, pursuant to Plaintiff's failure to respond to this Court's 12/12/08 Order, recommending that the 1 Complaint & 10 Amended Complaint be DISMISSED without prejudice, & recommending that 63 Defendants' MOTION for Summary Judgment be DENIED as moot. Objections to R&R due by 1/26/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry L. Jones, Jr on 1/14/09. (jct) |
Filing 61 ORDER, re 59 Mail Returned, directing plaintiff to notify this Court of his current address & his intent to continue prosectuion with this action, pro se, within 15 days of the date of this Order. Failure to comply with this Order shall result in the dismissal without prejudice of plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry L. Jones, Jr on 12/10/08. (jct) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.