Lindsey v. Blytheville Police Department et al
| M Dewayne Lindsey |
| Blytheville Police Department, Blytheville Arkansas, City of, Judy Andrews, Barrett Harrison, Shirley Connealy, James Sanders, Ray Jones, Shirley Overman, Myers Jeffers, Monte Hodges and Ross Thompson |
| 3:2009cv00015 |
| February 10, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Mississippi |
| Susan Webber Wright |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice pursuant to settlement; granting 29 Joint MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 3/23/2010. (jct)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER granting 14 Joint MOTION to Continue. The jury trial is reschduled for the week beginning 4/19/2010 at 1:30 p.m. in Jonesboro. (Discovery due by 2/22/2010, Motions due by 3/8/2010, Pretrial Disclosure Sheet due by 3/22/2010) All other deadlines remain as previously scheduled & consistent with the new trial date. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 7/30/09. (jct) Modified on 7/30/2009 to reflect trial date (jct).
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER granting 4 Motion to Dismiss Party. The City of Blytheville Police Department is dismissed as a party to this action. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 3/4/09. (jct)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
