McDaniel v. Montgomery et al
Calvin Ray McDaniel |
Thomas G Montgomery and Bart E Ziegenhorn |
3:2009cv00099 |
July 6, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Jonesboro Office |
Crittenden |
William R. Wilson |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER adopting 7 Report and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; case is dismissed with prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; this dismissal counts as a "strike" as defined by 28 USC 1915(g); the Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 USC 1915(a)(3), that an ifp appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 7/24/09. (mkf) |
Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, re 2 Complaint filed by Calvin Ray McDaniel, pursuant to the screening function mandated by 28 U.S.C. Section 1915A, recommending this case be DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; recommending that dismissal of this action CONSTITUTE a "strike", as defined by 28 U.S. C. Section 1915(g). Further, it is recommended that the Court CERTIFY, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order & Judgment adopting this Recommended Disposition would not be taken in good faith. Objections to R&R due by 7/20/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 7/9/09. (jct) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.