Scott v. Busby et al
| Michael Scott |
| Dick Busby, Zane Boyd and Teresa Bonner |
| 3:2010cv00007 |
| January 13, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Crittenden |
| Henry L. Jones |
| Susan Webber Wright |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER granting 53 Defendants' MOTION to Continue Pre-Jury Evidentiary Hearing and Motion for Leave to File Motion for Summary Judgment. The 5/16/11 hearing is cancelled & the Transportation Order 50 is hereby CANCELLED. Defendants shall file their Motion for Summary Judgment w/i 30 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 5/10/2011. (jct)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING 6 PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of U.S. Magistrate Judge Henry L. Jones, Jr. in their entirety. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Crittenden County Detention Facility is hereby dismissed from Plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 3/8/2010. (jct)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER, re 2 Complaint & 5 First Amended Complaint, directing the Clerk to prepare Summons for Defendants Busby, Boyd, Bonner & Long, & the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve said Defendants without prepayment of fees & costs or security therefore. Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry L. Jones, Jr on 2/19/2010. (jct)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
