Banks v. USA

Plaintiff: Heath Banks
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 3:2010cv00008
Filed: January 13, 2010
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Jonesboro Office
County: Greene
Presiding Judge: Susan Webber Wright
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 4, 2011 18 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT, pursuant to 17 Order entered this date, Banks's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/4/2011. (jct)
July 12, 2011 15 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER, re 14 Plaintiff's MOTION to Dismiss without prejudice, requesting clarification of the motion by 7/28/11. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/12/2011. (jct)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Banks v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heath Banks
Represented By: Stephen Matthew Lunde
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?