Murry v. Busby et al
| Eric Lavell Murry |
| Dick Busby, T Bonner, Zane Boyd and S Mobley |
| 3:2010cv00071 |
| April 8, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Crittenden |
| James M. Moody |
| Joe J. Volpe |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
JUDGMENT, pursuant to 21 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations, DISMISSING this case. Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an informa pauperis appeal taken from this Judgment & the accompanying Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 8/30/2010. (jct)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING 11 PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint setting forth the specif ically-requested information outlined in the Partial Recommended DIsposition; 4 Plaintiff's MOTION to Amend is DENIED; 8 Plaintiff's MOTION for Discovery is terminated as a motion. Defendants are directed to respond to Docket Number 8 as Plaintiff's discovery request, & proceed as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 5/24/2010. (jct)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
