Fulks v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|December 15, 2011
FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to Rule 54(b), per 38 Order entered 11/9/11 in favor of Union Pacific Railroad Company on the claims of Evangeline Fulks, Administratrix of the Estate of Julia Fulks, ruilng that Fulks' claims that different or addition al warning devices should have been installed at the crossing in question are preempted by federal law & dismissing those claims with prejudice. Pursuant to 47 Order of Dismissal entered this date, the remainder of this action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 12/15/2011. (jct)
|November 9, 2011
OPINION AND ORDER granting 22 Union Pacific's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Fulks' claims that different or additional warning devices should have been installed at the crossing in question are preempted by federal law and are dismissed. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 11/9/2011. (jct)
|March 31, 2011
ORDER, by agreement of the parties, separate defendant CSX Transportation Inc is hereby dismissed without prejudice from this action. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 3/31/2011. (jct)
|January 28, 2011
ORDER, re 12 Answer to Complaint, directing the Clerk to correct the style of the case to show that CSX Transportation, Inc. is the correct party defendant, replacing CSX Corporation. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 1/28/2011. (jct)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?