Nichols et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al
Brian Nichols and Wanda Nichols |
BNSF Railway Company and Christopher A Avery |
3:2011cv00101 |
June 3, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Jonesboro Office |
Mississippi |
J. Leon Holmes |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 ORDER granting request that the court retain jurisdiction for an additional fifteen days. The Courts jurisdiction is hereby extended up to, and including, September 16, 2012.. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 08/23/2012. (jak) |
Filing 29 ORDER OF DISMISSAL pursuant to settlement. Case dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 08/06/2012. (jak) |
Filing 22 OPINION AND ORDER granting 12 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by BNSF Railway Company. The Nichols' failure to warn claim is preempted by federal law and, therefore, is dismissed. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 7/19/2012. (jct) |
Filing 17 ORDER granting 11 MOTION to Dismiss Christopher A. Avery. Plaintiffs' complaint against Christopher A. Avery is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 7/3/2012. (jct) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting 7 MOTION to Continue filed by BNSF Railway Company. The 4/30/12 trial date is removed from the Court's docket. A new trial date & scheduling deadlines will be set by separate order. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 2/23/2012. (jct) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.