Brewer et al v. Gately et al
| Michael Jiles, Jeffery Carter, Chris Jackson and Dennis Brewer |
| Wayne Gately, William Johnson and West Memphis Arkansas, City of |
| 3:2011cv00207 |
| October 20, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Crittenden |
| James M. Moody |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
ORDER, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2), the Court finds that the case must be involuntarily dismissed without prejudice for failure to follow the Court's Order & failure to pay the filing fee. The Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 1/24/2012. (jct)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER reflecting that the check for payment of the filing fee in this matter has been unpaid due to insufficient funds. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to submit a cashier's check or money order in the amount of $403.00, payable to th e Clerk's Office, 600 West Capitol, Suite A-149, Little Rock, Arkansas 72201. If the payment is not received w/i 20 days of the date of this Order, the case will be closed. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order by regular & certified mail to Mr. Javier M. Bailey, & to provide a copy of this Order to the Financial Section of the Clerk's Office. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 1/3/2012. (jct)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
