Wortham v. Butterball Inc

Plaintiff: Sylvester Wortham
Defendant: Butterball Inc
Case Number: 3:2011cv00212
Filed: October 25, 2011
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Jonesboro Office
County: Poinsett
Presiding Judge: Brian S. Miller
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 20, 2011 14 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER OF DISMISSAL, pursuant to 13 Stipulation of the parties, dismissing this case with prejudice. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 12/20/2011. (jct)
October 25, 2011 2 Opinion or Order of the Court CLERK'S ORDER, pursuant to General Order No. 29, provisionally approving 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Sylvester Wortham. Signed at the Direction of the Court by J Turman on 10/25/2011. (jct)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wortham v. Butterball Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sylvester Wortham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Butterball Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?