Evans v. Crittenden Regional Hospital et al
| Marissa Evans |
| Crittenden Regional Hospital, Johnnie Holmes and Terry Chambers |
| 3:2011cv00229 |
| August 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Crittenden |
| Brian S. Miller |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
JUDGMENT pursuant to the jury verdict on December 11, 2012, in favor of defendants Crittenden Regional Hospital, Johnnie Holmes, Terry Chambers. Plaintiff Marissa Evans's claims are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 12/12/2012. (jak)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER vacating 28 Order on Motion in Limine. Further, Defendants' 24 MOTION in Limine is denied without prejudice. Although plaintiff has clearly stated that she did not rely on what appears to be a typographical error contained in def endants' leave policy, this is an issue best left for cross examination and it would be improper to preclude plaintiff from addressing it at trial. Defendants may, however, object to this evidence at trial and preserve its record for appeal. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 12/7/2012. (jak)
|
|
Filing
16
AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER regarding confidential information in this cause of action. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/29/2012. (jct)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
