Wells v. Coleman et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 5, 2012
JUDGMENT, consistent with 24 Order of Dismissal entered this date, this case is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, due to Plaintiff's failure to timely & properly comply with the Court's 3/2/2012 Order. Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment & the accompanying Order of Dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 4/5/2012. (jct)
|February 23, 2012
ORDER ADOPTING 5 PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of U.S. Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Plaintiff may PROCEED with his excessive force claim against Defendant Malone & his inadequate medical care claims against the Jane Doe Defendants, in their individual capacities only. All other claims & Defendants are DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted . Plaintiff must, within 90 days of the entry of this Order, file a Motion for Service containing the full names & service addresses for the Jane Doe Defendants. Failure to do so will result in their dismissal from this action. The Clerk is directed to issue summons for Defendant Malone, & the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve, the summons, Complaint & this Order on him w/o prepayment of fees & costs or security therefor. The Court CERTIFIES that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 2/23/2012. (jct)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?