Brewer et al v. Gately et al
| Michael Jiles, Jeffery Carter, Chris Jackson and Dennis Brewer |
| Wayne Gately, William Johnson and West Memphis Arkansas, City of |
| 3:2012cv00028 |
| January 31, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Crittenden |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
JUDGMENT pursuant to 18 Order dismissing the complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/15/2012. (jak)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER, for good cause shown, Plaintiffs time to serve their complaint is reopened and extended until 31 August 2012. Associating new co-counsel, which attorney Burks said she intended to do, should be explored sooner rather than later. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 08/08/2012. (jak)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER, due to counsel's lack of response to 6 Order, (Status Conference set for 7/31/2012 at 3:00 PM in Little Rock Courtroom # B-155 before Judge D. P. Marshall Jr.). Plaintiff's counsel, Addie Burks, should come prepared as directed. If this showing is not made, the Court will consider a reference to the appropriate committees. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to the named Plaintiffs (Brewer, Jiles, Carter & Jackson) & to the interested non-party (Lewis). Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/13/2012. (jct)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
