Ware v. Hall et al
3:2012cv00084 |
March 26, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Jonesboro Office |
Lee |
J. Leon Holmes |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 JUDGMENT consistent with 56 Order entered on this day, this case is dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to settlement. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 6/6/2013. (jak) |
Filing 50 ORDER directing the Clerk to issue and the U.S. Marshal to serve, trial subpoenas for Renee Canizales-Ware and Taylor Lattimore at addresses provided in 34 Witness List filed by Jonathan A Ware. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 05/15/2013. (kcs) |
Filing 49 ORDER directing the ADC to transport the Plaintiff to the 6/4/2013 Evidentiary Hearing in Little Rock, Arkansas before Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 05/02/2013. (kcs) |
Filing 41 ORDER directing the ADC to transport the Plaintiff to the Evidentiary Hearing/Trial scheduled for 1/23/2013 at 9:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 01/09/2013. (kcs) |
Filing 26 ORDER directing the Clerk to REFRAIN FROM DOCKETING any future written discovery from Plaintiff. Plaintiff's 24 Motion for Discovery, which has been construed as a Motion for a Subpoena Duces Tecum, is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to pre pare a subpoena duces tecum to the Warden of the East AR Regional Unit for the production, to the Court, of: (a) any Incident Reports prepared about the 9/24/11 use of force against Plaintiff at the Craighead County Detention Center; & (b) any photographs taken. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve the subpoena duces tecum on the Warden of the East AR Regional Unit. Plaintiff's 23 Motion for Bench Trial is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 6/26/2012. (jct) |
Filing 9 ORDER ADOPTING 5 PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of U.S. Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray as this Court's findings. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that 7 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Pursuant to the screening function ma ndated by 28 U.S.C. Section 1915A, Plaintiff's claims against Defendants, in their official capacities, are DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff may PROCEED with his excessive fo rce claims against Defendants in their individual capacities only. The Clerk is directed to prepare summons for Defendants Hall, Davidson, John Smith, Jeremy Smith & Holiday. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve said Defendants without prepayment of fees & costs or security therefor. The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/25/2012. (jct) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ware v. Hall et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.