James v.McCann et al
| 3:2012cv00122 |
| May 21, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Lincoln |
| D. P. Marshall Jr. |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
ORDER requesting that appointed counsel consult with James and report by 16 September 2013 whether he consents to Judge Young handling the case to judgment. If so, the consent form needs to be signed and sent to the Court for entry. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/27/2013. (jak)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER ADOPTING 68 PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Joint report on the estimated length of trial, number of witnesses, and consent (or not) to trial before Magistrate Judge Young due by 31 May 2013. Because of the need to handle other older cases first, a trial before me is unlikely for about a year or so. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 05/16/2013. (jak)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER directing the Clerk to correct names of defts Jack McCann and Matthew Kirby. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 7/2/12. (vjt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: James v.McCann et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
