James v.McCann et al
Case Number: 3:2012cv00122
Filed: May 21, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Jonesboro Office
County: Lincoln
Presiding Judge: D. P. Marshall Jr.
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER requesting that appointed counsel consult with James and report by 16 September 2013 whether he consents to Judge Young handling the case to judgment. If so, the consent form needs to be signed and sent to the Court for entry. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/27/2013. (jak)
May 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER ADOPTING 68 PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Joint report on the estimated length of trial, number of witnesses, and consent (or not) to trial before Magistrate Judge Young due by 31 May 2013. Because of the need to handle other older cases first, a trial before me is unlikely for about a year or so. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 05/16/2013. (jak)
July 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER directing the Clerk to correct names of defts Jack McCann and Matthew Kirby. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 7/2/12. (vjt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: James v.McCann et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?