Niceschwander v. Social Security Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Arkansas Eastern District Niceschwander v. Social Security Administration

Niceschwander v. Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	Melissa Niceschwander
Defendant:	Social Security Administration
Case Number:	3:2013cv00167
Filed:	July 15, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office:	Jonesboro Office
County:	Craighead
Presiding Judge:	J. Thomas Ray
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 15, 2014	Filing 16 ORDER granting 14 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff is awarded $5,771.93 in attorney's fees and expenses under the EAJA. Consistent with the Commissioner's usual procedure in light of Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), the check awarding EAJA fees should be made payable to Plaintiff, but mailed to the care of Plaintiff's attorney at the attorneys office. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 10/15/2014. (jak)
June 23, 2014	Filing 13 JUDGMENT: the decision of Social Security Administration is remanded for action consistent with 12 Memorandum Opinion and Order. Judgment entered in favor of Plaintiff Melissa Niceschwander. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 06/23/2014. (ljb)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 15, 2014

Filing 16 ORDER granting 14 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff is awarded $5,771.93 in attorney's fees and expenses under the EAJA. Consistent with the Commissioner's usual procedure in light of Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), the check awarding EAJA fees should be made payable to Plaintiff, but mailed to the care of Plaintiff's attorney at the attorneys office. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 10/15/2014. (jak)

June 23, 2014

Filing 13 JUDGMENT: the decision of Social Security Administration is remanded for action consistent with 12 Memorandum Opinion and Order. Judgment entered in favor of Plaintiff Melissa Niceschwander. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 06/23/2014. (ljb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Niceschwander v. Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By:	Stacey Elise McCord
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Niceschwander
Represented By:	David Jerome Throesch
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?